Transportation and Warehousing
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Transportation and Warehousing
Employment Growth
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of transportation and warehousing employment growth across all of Ohio's 88 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Ohio Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the transportation and warehousing employment growth of Ohio's 88 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Page 2 of 9
Transportation and Warehousing
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Transportation and Warehousing
Employment Growth
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
This figure displays the 88 counties of Ohio as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the transportation and warehousing employment growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term transportation and warehousing employment growth exceeded the statewide average of 5.33%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at 5.33% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate trailed the statewide average (5.33%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 18 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 38 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 21 counties whose most recent (2022) transportation and warehousing employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (7.70%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 35 counties whose transportation and warehousing employment growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 88 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of 5.33% over 2010-2022 and 7.70% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (5.33%) and near-term (7.70%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (5.33%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Ohio average (7.70%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate fell below the statewide average (5.33%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (7.70%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (5.33%) and near-term (7.70%).
   
 
Summary of Ohio's 88 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(7.70%)
Above
(7.70%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(5.33%)
7
11
18
Below
(5.33%)
28
10
38
 
35
21
56
 
   
Page 3 of 9
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Ohio counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Ohio's average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 5.33%) as well as near-term (2022 = 7.70%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Ohio's 88 counties, just 11 (13%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Page 4 of 9
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 7 Ohio counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = 5.33%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = 7.70%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 7 (8%) of Ohio's 88 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Page 5 of 9
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
This figure shows the distribution of the 10 Ohio counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = 5.33%), while they outpaced Ohio's average near-term (2022 = 7.70%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Ohio's 88 counties, only 11% (10) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Page 6 of 9
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Ohio:
2010-2022 = 5.33%
2022 = 7.70%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 28 Ohio counties classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 5.33%) as well as near-term (2022 = 7.70%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual transportation and warehousing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
32% of Ohio's counties, 28 of 88, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Page 7 of 9
   
 
Ohio
Transportation and Warehousing Employment Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
6
8.20
 
3
21.00
6,960
 
18
5.79
 
21
8.68
52,722
 
5
8.26
 
15
9.80
3,273
 
7
8.08
 
23
8.63
4,230
 
3
14.06
 
1
50.80
8,721
 
13
6.21
 
11
11.13
19,663
 
9
7.93
 
10
11.15
1,266
 
16
5.91
 
12
10.34
9,222
 
10
7.51
 
4
20.60
25,234
 
2
17.63
 
18
9.51
8,963
 
4
8.66
 
2
27.84
11,607
Slipping Counties
 
15
6.12
 
37
5.91
86,485
 
17
5.89
 
55
2.38
4,810
 
1
23.49
 
70
-23.55
16,114
 
11
7.01
 
35
6.34
6,404
 
14
6.20
 
25
7.68
3,295
 
12
6.79
 
32
6.64
1,799
 
8
7.99
 
33
6.58
2,916
Gaining Counties
 
25
4.03
 
20
8.82
1,394
 
26
3.90
 
22
8.68
14,368
 
31
3.05
 
8
12.16
4,410
 
20
4.97
 
14
10.04
1,184
 
32
2.96
 
17
9.59
1,782
 
40
2.14
 
6
14.18
620
 
41
2.05
 
13
10.18
12,096
 
39
2.61
 
5
15.06
298
 
21
4.84
 
7
13.17
6,005
 
28
3.87
 
19
9.39
198
Lagging Counties
 
45
1.39
 
59
2.03
301
 
46
1.34
 
39
5.72
1,736
 
24
4.17
 
64
0.34
595
 
50
0.88
 
47
4.12
4,957
 
43
1.80
 
31
6.68
2,075
 
51
0.31
 
61
1.86
657
 
44
1.69
 
63
0.91
1,768
 
27
3.88
 
41
5.68
5,006
 
47
1.18
 
50
3.77
550
 
19
5.20
 
66
-1.48
1,063
 
22
4.82
 
26
7.58
25,360
 
54
-0.25
 
36
6.13
381
 
56
-1.65
 
69
-3.97
678
 
55
-0.83
 
58
2.19
2,057
 
38
2.67
 
28
7.25
2,146
 
37
2.77
 
29
6.94
801
 
36
2.78
 
43
5.43
1,300
 
29
3.73
 
53
2.66
2,625
 
35
2.83
 
44
5.08
6,231
 
23
4.61
 
27
7.39
1,454
 
34
2.89
 
45
4.65
1,755
 
48
1.08
 
67
-1.68
352
 
33
2.96
 
52
2.86
252
 
30
3.13
 
46
4.32
1,184
 
53
-0.21
 
54
2.54
1,129
 
52
0.16
 
49
4.05
1,027
 
42
1.94
 
38
5.84
1,850
 
49
0.89
 
62
1.49
1,291
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
51
3.07
2,081
 
U
U
 
40
5.72
1,165
 
U
U
 
9
11.72
610
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
24
8.60
619
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
1,467
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
57
2.23
1,420
 
U
U
 
56
2.35
435
 
U
U
 
30
6.89
5,071
 
U
U
 
S
S
195
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
65
-0.91
650
 
U
U
 
34
6.36
468
 
U
U
 
68
-2.10
840
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
60
1.97
879
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
16
9.62
2,746
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
48
4.06
436
 
U
U
 
42
5.49
2,708
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.33
 
7.70
427,615
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.81
 
8.06
11,473,500
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510800_LSGL
 
   
Page 8 of 9
A Special Thanks to Our Hosts & Sponsors:


Page 9 of 9
Brought To You By:
Copyright © 2023. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.